From a01e9730359ca8ff4886986dffa9f4c3eeb64782 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 01:20:40 +0200 Subject: treewide: clarify the maintainer situation on packages lacking one The status quo is that any Parabola hacker is expected to (be able to) modify any packages, and having a single maintainer of a package discourages that practice as people would typically send a patch to the maintainer instead of pushing it directly. So for a start we can add common maintainership on package lacking any "Maintainer: " header for packages in repositories that are supposed to be maintained. Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli --- libre/kde-development-environment-meta/PKGBUILD | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'libre/kde-development-environment-meta') diff --git a/libre/kde-development-environment-meta/PKGBUILD b/libre/kde-development-environment-meta/PKGBUILD index 00164afb6..0326949d6 100644 --- a/libre/kde-development-environment-meta/PKGBUILD +++ b/libre/kde-development-environment-meta/PKGBUILD @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ # Note: This PKGBUILD is automatically generated by the scripts at https://cgit.kde.org/kdesdk-devenv-dependencies.git/ # Don't manually edit the PKGBUILD, edit the upstream template instead # See README file for instructions +# Maintainers: Parabola hackers # parabola changes and rationale: # - removed nonfree qt5-webengine from depends() -- cgit v1.2.2