diff options
author | Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> | 2022-08-05 09:28:07 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> | 2022-08-05 09:30:08 +0200 |
commit | 0259f4dcef6c1095c97cf84548e944789122d4ff (patch) | |
tree | d080f73d21caf4cc26f6f46396fae181274f96d3 /users/1042.yml | |
parent | 1755cf38e81ab58de3a63f850380983f060518a0 (diff) |
GNUtoo: I'm back
In commit 71059ce4e93cb772baec40be7d90852b95e709f7 ("GNUtoo: resign
from Parabola"), I resigned. I'm now back.
What happened (mostly) in the bug #1035 [1] and a bit on #parabola on
liberachat is that me and bill-auger had many missunderstandings on
top of missunderstandings in this bug.
The question that triggered missunderstandings was if we would need to
keep Guix or not on the rationale that, according to bill-auger, Guix
was not FSDG compliant.
My point of view was that whatever decision we take, we need to stay
consistent in Parabola and with the wider community of FSDG compliant
distritions and also have a rationale for taking each decision.
So for me we cannot have at the same time Guix being listed in the
free-distro page[2] and have a downstream distribution decide that
Guix is not FSDG compliant. For me, if it's not FSDG compliant, it
should be fixed upstream somehow and then used as a rationale in
FSDG compliant distributions if upstream decides that Guix is not
compliant.
Though Parabola could take decisions to exclude Guix on other grounds
(for instance it could decide for some reasons to remove all third
party package managers for some good reasons yet to be found).
To explain my position on that, I wrote very long messages that were
not read by bill-auger because they were too long and so we starting
having missunderstanding on top of missunderstandings. Part of it
could also be due to me not having taken into account that he would
not have read or in mind all the previous messages.
And after that I also missinterpretated text he wrote (that could be
interpretated in multiple ways) and I assumed he was pushing me on
purpose to demonstrate a point because the text could also be
interpretated in this way.
And since pushing people is dangerous, because contributors often are
overworked, I wanted to at least get the point accross that pushing
people like that was not something to be done, and that was something
very important to me to get accross because the health of contributors
and the community in general is extremely important.
But then he didn't listen because that issue already took too much
time and I really needed to get that point accross.
That explains why I wrote that:
This community has become toxic because there is no reguard for
contributors health.
I didn't add much details though because I was extremely nerovous.
Right after that, the most important missunderstandings were solved on
IRC after I resigned, so since they are now solved, I can come back.
References:
-----------
[1]https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1035
[2]https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'users/1042.yml')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions