Re: [Dev] [RFC] rewording the Social Contract

Sorry it took so long for me to reply, my heuristic mail filters
mis-categorized your reply, so I didn't see it.

At Sun, 07 Jul 2013 17:23:34 -0300,
Nicolás Reynolds wrote:
> "Luke T. Shumaker" <lukeshu at sbcglobal.net> writes:
>
> > So last night/this morning, I threw up a "Nomenclature" page on the
> > wiki[0].  The page is mostly meant to be descriptive, not
> > prescriptive, but part of its purpose is to standardize.
> >
> > Then I looked at our Social Contract[1], and noticed that it is not
> > consistent with our nomenclature.
> >
> > Following is my proposal for a new version of the Social Contract.
> > The format is Markdown.  MediaWiki's wiki-text sucks for email.
>
> +1 item 2 should also include documentation and other projects alongside
> repositories and packages.

-   it.  That includes our packages and repositories.
+   it.  That includes our packages, repositories, documentation and
+   other efforts.

> should we specify "arch and derivatives" on item 4?

I'm not sure what you want it to say.

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/Parabola_Social_Contract.md b/Parabola_Social_Contract.md
index 4ba70ee..3ae9f77 100644
--- a/Parabola_Social_Contract.md
+++ b/Parabola_Social_Contract.md
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ movement](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software_movement)
     against non-free software. Parabola will strive to support other
     Free Software projects as best it can and any information from our
     project will be available for anybody who needs it. That includes
-    our packages and repositories.
+    our packages, repositories, documentation and other efforts.
 3.  **Parabola and its community**: Our community is democratic in its
     essence, so the community is included whenever there is a need to
     make a decision. We encourage community participation in the